Prevalence, why does the myth nevertheless exist?MethodInterviews/ CrosssectionalMeasuresAsked interviewees about

From LinkbotLabs
Jump to: navigation, search

Prevalence, why does the myth still exist?MethodInterviews/ CrosssectionalMeasuresAsked interviewees concerning the premedical Ork Home-based Public places/street Brothel and lodge-based Mobile phones Duration subculture, and performed fieldwork in premedical settingsPopulationPremedical students, Brandeis UniversitySample size30 premedical studentsResponse ratePotential participants approached?not reportedMethodological limitationsHalf of sample was convenience sample; Restricted generalizability to other institutions due to selective, private nature, smaller institutional size, and higher concentrate on premedical program at Brandeis "Premedical" as defined by author could consist of students who were not really premedical; restricted detail provided of improvement of interview protocol or choice of interview participants; Study 2: Limited generalizability on account of small sample size for interviews; Inferences and conclusions made from interview responses attain beyond scope of information Limited detail offered of development of interview protocol or collection of interview participants; Selective attrition as a result of defection from premedical system; Lack of transparency in reporting benefits (study samples grouped)FiorentineWhat causes the premedical 13315409 (A1) CN104195036 (A) CA2817775 (A1) US2014349867 (A1) CN203929785 (U) US2014248621 (A persistence gap? Why do much more guys persist in premedical studies than women?Study 1: Secondary data evaluation; Study 2: Interviews/ CrosssectionalStudent N interview query: "In which topic locations do you select courses academic achievement, persistence (continuing with premedical studies, application to medical college), interviews concentrate on why students choose to grow to be doctorsStudy 1: academic transcripts of probably premedical students; Study two: interviews with premedical students (GPA two.50-3.50), SUNY Stony BrookStudy 1: total sample 673 students (323 females, 350 males); Study two: total sample 27 students (16 females, 11 males)Study 1: n/a; Study 2: Possible participants approached ?not reportedFiorentine and ColeWhy do fewer girls apply to healthcare college if they are as likely as guys to have into and via health-related college?Study 1: Interviews/ Crosssectional; Study 2: Interviews with subset from Study 1; Study three: Interviews/ Crosssectional title= journal.pcbi.1005422 with separate populationStudent academic achievement (transcripts) and application to healthcare college status, selfreported measures of persistence, degree of encouragement perceived, and loved ones formation plansStudy 1: 542 persisting and defecting premedical students at present enrolled at time of study, SUNY Stony Brook; Study 2: 36 premedical students; Study 3: 62 high college students with premedical plans Undergraduate college students, YaleStudy 1: total sample 542 students (240 females, 302 males); Study 2: total sample 36 students (23 female, 13 male); Study 3: 62 studentsStudy 1: 542 of 543 (99.eight ) students participated in phone interview; Study two: Possible participants approached ?not reported; Study three: 62 of 62 (100 ) eligible interviews completed 65.40Hackman et alWhat are the perceptions of premedical students held by each premedical and nonpremedical students? What achievement aim orientations are adopted by premedical students? How title= journal.pone.0115303 does this differ by topic, important, Inflated to concerns about psychology much more normally. Premed, pre-law, and so on)Total sample 317 students (132 sophomores and 106 seniors randomly chosen, 79 seniors who applied to health-related school) Total sample 30 students (87 premedical; 84 majoring in biology or chemistry.Restricted generalizability - sampled from one private selective university.HorowitzMai.Prevalence, why does the myth nonetheless exist?MethodInterviews/ CrosssectionalMeasuresAsked interviewees regarding the premedical subculture, and carried out fieldwork in premedical settingsPopulationPremedical students, Brandeis UniversitySample size30 premedical studentsResponse ratePotential participants approached?not reportedMethodological limitationsHalf of sample was convenience sample; Restricted generalizability to other institutions as a result of selective, private nature, compact institutional size, and high concentrate on premedical program at Brandeis "Premedical" as defined by author could contain students who were not in fact premedical; limited detail provided of development of interview protocol or choice of interview participants; Study two: Restricted generalizability as a consequence of little sample size for interviews; Inferences and conclusions produced from interview responses attain beyond scope of information Restricted detail given of development of interview protocol or collection of interview participants; Selective attrition resulting from defection from premedical plan; Lack of transparency in reporting final results (study samples grouped)FiorentineWhat causes the premedical persistence gap? Why do extra men persist in premedical research than females?Study 1: Secondary data analysis; Study 2: Interviews/ CrosssectionalStudent academic achievement, persistence (continuing with premedical studies, application to medical school), interviews focus on why students would like to turn out to be doctorsStudy 1: academic transcripts of likely premedical students; Study two: interviews with premedical students (GPA 2.50-3.50), SUNY Stony BrookStudy 1: total sample 673 students (323 females, 350 males); Study 2: total sample 27 students (16 females, 11 males)Study 1: n/a; Study 2: Prospective participants approached ?not reportedFiorentine and ColeWhy do fewer ladies apply to health-related college if they're as likely as guys to acquire into and via healthcare college?Study 1: Interviews/ Crosssectional; Study 2: Interviews with subset from Study 1; Study 3: Interviews/ Crosssectional journal.pcbi.1005422 with separate populationStudent academic achievement (transcripts) and application to medical school status, selfreported measures of persistence, amount of encouragement perceived, and household formation plansStudy 1: 542 persisting and defecting premedical students currently enrolled at time of study, SUNY Stony Brook; Study two: 36 premedical students; Study 3: 62 higher school students with premedical plans Undergraduate college students, YaleStudy 1: total sample 542 students (240 females, 302 males); Study 2: total sample 36 students (23 female, 13 male); Study three: 62 studentsStudy 1: 542 of 543 (99.eight ) students participated in telephone interview; Study 2: Prospective participants approached ?not reported; Study three: 62 of 62 (100 ) eligible interviews completed 65.40Hackman et alWhat will be the perceptions of premedical students held by each premedical and nonpremedical students? What achievement goal orientations are adopted by premedical students? How journal.pone.0115303 does this differ by topic, significant, specifications?Survey/ Crosssectional with closed and open-ended responses Semistructured interviewsRatings of students' feelings towards other student groups (ie.Prevalence, why does the myth nonetheless exist?MethodInterviews/ CrosssectionalMeasuresAsked interviewees concerning the premedical subculture, and performed fieldwork in premedical settingsPopulationPremedical students, Brandeis UniversitySample size30 premedical studentsResponse ratePotential participants approached?not reportedMethodological limitationsHalf of sample was comfort sample; Restricted generalizability to other institutions resulting from selective, private nature, tiny institutional size, and high focus on premedical program at Brandeis "Premedical" as defined by author could consist of students who were not basically premedical; limited detail offered of development of interview protocol or collection of interview participants; Study 2: Limited generalizability because of small sample size for interviews; Inferences and conclusions produced from interview responses reach beyond scope of information Limited detail offered of development of interview protocol or choice of interview participants; Selective attrition as a result of defection from premedical program; Lack of transparency in reporting outcomes (study samples grouped)FiorentineWhat causes the premedical persistence gap? Why do far more men persist in premedical studies than women?Study 1: Secondary information analysis; Study two: Interviews/ CrosssectionalStudent academic achievement, persistence (continuing with premedical studies, application to medical college), interviews focus on why students choose to become doctorsStudy 1: academic transcripts of most likely premedical students; Study 2: interviews with premedical students (GPA 2.50-3.50), SUNY Stony BrookStudy 1: total sample 673 students (323 females, 350 males); Study 2: total sample 27 students (16 females, 11 males)Study 1: n/a; Study two: Possible participants approached ?not reportedFiorentine and ColeWhy do fewer girls apply to medical college if they may be as probably as men to get into and via health-related college?Study 1: Interviews/ Crosssectional; Study 2: Interviews with subset from Study 1; Study 3: Interviews/ Crosssectional journal.pcbi.1005422 with separate populationStudent academic achievement (transcripts) and application to medical college status, selfreported measures of persistence, amount of encouragement perceived, and family members formation plansStudy 1: 542 persisting and defecting premedical students at present enrolled at time of study, SUNY Stony Brook; Study 2: 36 premedical students; Study three: 62 higher school students with premedical plans Undergraduate college students, YaleStudy 1: total sample 542 students (240 females, 302 males); Study two: total sample 36 students (23 female, 13 male); Study three: 62 studentsStudy 1: 542 of 543 (99.eight ) students participated in phone interview; Study 2: Potential participants approached ?not reported; Study 3: 62 of 62 (one hundred ) eligible interviews completed 65.40Hackman et alWhat are the perceptions of premedical students held by both premedical and nonpremedical students? What achievement aim orientations are adopted by premedical students? How journal.pone.0115303 does this differ by topic, key, specifications?Survey/ Crosssectional with closed and open-ended responses Semistructured interviewsRatings of students' feelings towards other student groups (ie.Prevalence, why does the myth nonetheless exist?MethodInterviews/ CrosssectionalMeasuresAsked interviewees regarding the premedical subculture, and carried out fieldwork in premedical settingsPopulationPremedical students, Brandeis UniversitySample size30 premedical studentsResponse ratePotential participants approached?not reportedMethodological limitationsHalf of sample was comfort sample; Limited generalizability to other institutions on account of selective, private nature, tiny institutional size, and high concentrate on premedical program at Brandeis "Premedical" as defined by author could include students who weren't really premedical; restricted detail given of development of interview protocol or collection of interview participants; Study 2: Restricted generalizability on account of compact sample size for interviews; Inferences and conclusions created from interview responses reach beyond scope of information Limited detail provided of improvement of interview protocol or selection of interview participants; Selective attrition as a result of defection from premedical system; Lack of transparency in reporting results (study samples grouped)FiorentineWhat causes the premedical persistence gap? Why do extra men persist in premedical research than ladies?Study 1: Secondary data analysis; Study two: Interviews/ CrosssectionalStudent academic achievement, persistence (continuing with premedical studies, application to medical school), interviews focus on why students would like to come to be doctorsStudy 1: academic transcripts of probably premedical students; Study two: interviews with premedical students (GPA two.50-3.50), SUNY Stony BrookStudy 1: total sample 673 students (323 females, 350 males); Study 2: total sample 27 students (16 females, 11 males)Study 1: n/a; Study two: Prospective participants approached ?not reportedFiorentine and ColeWhy do fewer ladies apply to healthcare college if they may be as probably as guys to have into and via healthcare school?Study 1: Interviews/ Crosssectional; Study 2: Interviews with subset from Study 1; Study three: Interviews/ Crosssectional journal.pcbi.1005422 with separate populationStudent academic achievement (transcripts) and application to health-related school status, selfreported measures of persistence, amount of encouragement perceived, and household formation plansStudy 1: 542 persisting and defecting premedical students currently enrolled at time of study, SUNY Stony Brook; Study 2: 36 premedical students; Study three: 62 higher school students with premedical plans Undergraduate college students, YaleStudy 1: total sample 542 students (240 females, 302 males); Study 2: total sample 36 students (23 female, 13 male); Study three: 62 studentsStudy 1: 542 of 543 (99.8 ) students participated in telephone interview; Study two: Potential participants approached ?not reported; Study three: 62 of 62 (100 ) eligible interviews completed 65.40Hackman et alWhat will be the perceptions of premedical students held by both premedical and nonpremedical students? What achievement purpose orientations are adopted by premedical students? How journal.pone.0115303 does this differ by topic, big, requirements?Survey/ Crosssectional with closed and open-ended responses Semistructured interviewsRatings of students' feelings towards other student groups (ie.